feat: comprehensive project structure improvements and Cloud for Sovereignty landing zone
- Add Cloud for Sovereignty landing zone architecture and deployment - Implement complete legal document management system - Reorganize documentation with improved navigation - Add infrastructure improvements (Dockerfiles, K8s, monitoring) - Add operational improvements (graceful shutdown, rate limiting, caching) - Create comprehensive project structure documentation - Add Azure deployment automation scripts - Improve repository navigation and organization
This commit is contained in:
defiQUG
240
docs/governance/procedures/kyc-aml.md
Normal file
240
docs/governance/procedures/kyc-aml.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
|
||||
# KYC/AML Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
|
||||
|
||||
**Version:** 1.0
|
||||
**Date:** November 10, 2025
|
||||
**Status:** Draft
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Know Your Customer (KYC), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and sanctions screening for eResidency and eCitizenship applications.
|
||||
|
||||
## Screening Lists
|
||||
|
||||
### Sanctions Lists
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Sources:**
|
||||
* UN Security Council Sanctions
|
||||
* EU Sanctions
|
||||
* OFAC (US Treasury)
|
||||
* UK HM Treasury
|
||||
* Other relevant jurisdictions
|
||||
|
||||
**Update Frequency:**
|
||||
* Daily automated updates
|
||||
* Manual review for high-priority updates
|
||||
* Real-time screening for new applications
|
||||
|
||||
### PEP Lists
|
||||
|
||||
**Sources:**
|
||||
* World-Check
|
||||
* Dow Jones Risk & Compliance
|
||||
* ComplyAdvantage
|
||||
* Other commercial providers
|
||||
|
||||
**Categories:**
|
||||
* Heads of State
|
||||
* Senior government officials
|
||||
* Senior political party officials
|
||||
* Senior judicial officials
|
||||
* Senior military officials
|
||||
* State-owned enterprise executives
|
||||
* Close associates and family members
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Scoring
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Factors
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Risk:**
|
||||
* Clear identity verification
|
||||
* No sanctions matches
|
||||
* No PEP matches
|
||||
* Low-risk geography
|
||||
* Established history
|
||||
|
||||
**Medium Risk:**
|
||||
* Partial identity verification
|
||||
* Potential PEP match (distant)
|
||||
* Medium-risk geography
|
||||
* Limited history
|
||||
|
||||
**High Risk:**
|
||||
* Failed identity verification
|
||||
* Sanctions match
|
||||
* Direct PEP match
|
||||
* High-risk geography
|
||||
* Suspicious patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Score Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
**Formula:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Risk Score = (KYC Risk × 0.4) + (Sanctions Risk × 0.4) + (Geographic Risk × 0.2)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Thresholds:**
|
||||
* Auto-approve: < 0.3
|
||||
* Manual review: 0.3 - 0.8
|
||||
* Auto-reject: > 0.8
|
||||
|
||||
## Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)
|
||||
|
||||
### Triggers
|
||||
|
||||
**Automatic EDD:**
|
||||
* PEP match
|
||||
* High-risk geography
|
||||
* Risk score > 0.7
|
||||
* Suspicious patterns
|
||||
* Large transactions (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
### EDD Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Additional Checks:**
|
||||
* Source of funds verification
|
||||
* Additional identity documents
|
||||
* References or attestations
|
||||
* Background checks
|
||||
* Enhanced monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
### EDD Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify EDD trigger
|
||||
2. Request additional information
|
||||
3. Verify sources
|
||||
4. Conduct enhanced screening
|
||||
5. Risk assessment
|
||||
6. Decision
|
||||
|
||||
## PEP Handling
|
||||
|
||||
### PEP Classification
|
||||
|
||||
**Direct PEP:**
|
||||
* Current or former PEP
|
||||
* Immediate family member
|
||||
* Close associate
|
||||
|
||||
**Indirect PEP:**
|
||||
* Distant relative
|
||||
* Former associate
|
||||
* Historical connection
|
||||
|
||||
### PEP Process
|
||||
|
||||
**Direct PEP:**
|
||||
1. Automatic EDD
|
||||
2. Enhanced screening
|
||||
3. Manual review required
|
||||
4. Risk assessment
|
||||
5. Decision with justification
|
||||
|
||||
**Indirect PEP:**
|
||||
1. Standard EDD
|
||||
2. Risk assessment
|
||||
3. Decision based on risk
|
||||
|
||||
## Source of Funds
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**If Applicable:**
|
||||
* Fee payments
|
||||
* Donations
|
||||
* Service contributions
|
||||
* Other financial transactions
|
||||
|
||||
### Verification
|
||||
|
||||
**Methods:**
|
||||
* Bank statements
|
||||
* Payment receipts
|
||||
* Transaction history
|
||||
* Attestations
|
||||
* Third-party verification
|
||||
|
||||
## Audit Trail
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Documentation:**
|
||||
* All screening results
|
||||
* Risk assessments
|
||||
* Decisions and justifications
|
||||
* EDD materials
|
||||
* Audit logs
|
||||
|
||||
### Retention
|
||||
|
||||
**Periods:**
|
||||
* KYC artifacts: 365 days (regulatory)
|
||||
* Application metadata: 6 years
|
||||
* Audit logs: 7 years
|
||||
* Credential status: Indefinite
|
||||
|
||||
### Access
|
||||
|
||||
**Controls:**
|
||||
* Role-based access
|
||||
* Audit logging
|
||||
* Data minimization
|
||||
* Encryption at rest
|
||||
* Secure transmission
|
||||
|
||||
## Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
### Regulatory Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Jurisdictions:**
|
||||
* GDPR (EU)
|
||||
* CCPA (California)
|
||||
* Other applicable laws
|
||||
|
||||
### Reporting
|
||||
|
||||
**Obligations:**
|
||||
* Suspicious activity reports (if applicable)
|
||||
* Regulatory reporting
|
||||
* Internal reporting
|
||||
* Audit reporting
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
### Mock Audit
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope:**
|
||||
* End-to-end process testing
|
||||
* Risk assessment validation
|
||||
* EDD trigger testing
|
||||
* Audit trail verification
|
||||
* Compliance checks
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Requirements:**
|
||||
* All processes documented
|
||||
* All decisions justified
|
||||
* All audit trails complete
|
||||
* All compliance checks passed
|
||||
* No critical findings
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|
||||
|---------|------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| 1.0 | 2025-11-10 | CISO | Initial draft |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Approval
|
||||
|
||||
**CISO:** _________________ Date: _________
|
||||
|
||||
**Chancellor:** _________________ Date: _________
|
||||
|
||||
**External Counsel:** _________________ Date: _________
|
||||
|
||||
336
docs/governance/procedures/root-key-ceremony.md
Normal file
336
docs/governance/procedures/root-key-ceremony.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,336 @@
|
||||
# Root Key Ceremony Runbook
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** Friday, December 5, 2025, 10:00–13:00 PT
|
||||
**Location:** Secure facility (air‑gapped room), dual‑control entry
|
||||
**Status:** Scheduled
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Roles & Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
### Ceremony Officer
|
||||
* Leads the ceremony
|
||||
* Ensures all steps are followed
|
||||
* Documents all actions
|
||||
* Coordinates with witnesses
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Custodians (3)
|
||||
* Multi-party control (2-of-3)
|
||||
* Participate in HSM initialization
|
||||
* Witness key generation
|
||||
* Verify backup procedures
|
||||
|
||||
### Auditor
|
||||
* Independent verification
|
||||
* Reviews all procedures
|
||||
* Validates artifacts
|
||||
* Signs off on completion
|
||||
|
||||
### Witnesses (2)
|
||||
* External observers
|
||||
* Verify procedures
|
||||
* Sign witness statements
|
||||
* Maintain independence
|
||||
|
||||
### Video Scribe
|
||||
* Records the ceremony
|
||||
* Documents all actions
|
||||
* Creates tamper-evident archive
|
||||
* Provides notarization support
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Pre-Ceremony Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
### Week Before
|
||||
- [ ] Confirm all participants
|
||||
- [ ] Verify secure facility access
|
||||
- [ ] Test HSM equipment
|
||||
- [ ] Prepare tamper-evident bags
|
||||
- [ ] Schedule notary
|
||||
- [ ] Prepare ceremony scripts
|
||||
|
||||
### Day Before
|
||||
- [ ] Room sweep & security check
|
||||
- [ ] Device inventory
|
||||
- [ ] Hash baseline of all equipment
|
||||
- [ ] Verify air-gap status
|
||||
- [ ] Test recording equipment
|
||||
- [ ] Prepare backup media
|
||||
|
||||
### Day Of (Pre-Ceremony)
|
||||
- [ ] Final room sweep
|
||||
- [ ] Verify all participants present
|
||||
- [ ] Check recording equipment
|
||||
- [ ] Verify HSM status
|
||||
- [ ] Confirm air-gap maintained
|
||||
- [ ] Begin video recording
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Ceremony Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Room Sweep & Hash Baseline
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration:** 15 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions:**
|
||||
1. Verify room is secure and air-gapped
|
||||
2. Inventory all devices and equipment
|
||||
3. Create hash baseline of all equipment
|
||||
4. Document all serial numbers
|
||||
5. Verify no unauthorized devices
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts:**
|
||||
* Device inventory list
|
||||
* Hash baseline document
|
||||
* Room security checklist
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. HSM Initialization (M of N)
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration:** 30 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions:**
|
||||
1. Initialize Thales Luna HSM
|
||||
2. Configure multi-party control (2-of-3)
|
||||
3. Verify key custodian access
|
||||
4. Test HSM functionality
|
||||
5. Document HSM configuration
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts:**
|
||||
* HSM configuration document
|
||||
* Key custodian access logs
|
||||
* HSM test results
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Generate Root Key
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration:** 45 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions:**
|
||||
1. Generate root key pair in HSM
|
||||
2. Verify key generation
|
||||
3. Extract public key
|
||||
4. Create Certificate Signing Request (CSR)
|
||||
5. Document key parameters
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts:**
|
||||
* Root key generation log
|
||||
* Public key certificate
|
||||
* CSR document
|
||||
* Key parameters document
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Seal Backups
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration:** 30 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions:**
|
||||
1. Create encrypted backups
|
||||
2. Seal backups in tamper-evident bags
|
||||
3. Label all backups
|
||||
4. Verify backup integrity
|
||||
5. Store backups in secure location
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts:**
|
||||
* Backup inventory
|
||||
* Tamper-evident bag log
|
||||
* Backup integrity checks
|
||||
* Storage location record
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Sign Issuing CA
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration:** 30 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions:**
|
||||
1. Generate Issuing CA certificate
|
||||
2. Sign with root key
|
||||
3. Verify certificate signature
|
||||
4. Publish certificate
|
||||
5. Document certificate details
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts:**
|
||||
* Issuing CA certificate
|
||||
* Certificate signature verification
|
||||
* Certificate publication record
|
||||
* Certificate details document
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Publish Fingerprints
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration:** 20 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions:**
|
||||
1. Calculate certificate fingerprints
|
||||
2. Publish fingerprints publicly
|
||||
3. Create DID documents (offline)
|
||||
4. Prepare for online publication
|
||||
5. Document publication process
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts:**
|
||||
* Fingerprint document
|
||||
* DID documents
|
||||
* Publication record
|
||||
* Online bridge preparation
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Record & Notarize Minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration:** 30 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions:**
|
||||
1. Compile ceremony minutes
|
||||
2. Have all participants sign
|
||||
3. Notarize minutes
|
||||
4. Create tamper-evident archive
|
||||
5. Store original minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Artifacts:**
|
||||
* Ceremony minutes
|
||||
* Participant signatures
|
||||
* Notarized document
|
||||
* Tamper-evident archive
|
||||
* Storage record
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Artifacts Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Artifacts
|
||||
- [ ] Root CSR
|
||||
- [ ] CP/CPS v1.0
|
||||
- [ ] Offline DID documents
|
||||
- [ ] Hash manifest
|
||||
- [ ] Sealed tamper-evident bags
|
||||
- [ ] Ceremony minutes
|
||||
- [ ] Participant signatures
|
||||
- [ ] Notarized document
|
||||
- [ ] Video recording
|
||||
- [ ] Backup media
|
||||
|
||||
### Verification
|
||||
- [ ] All artifacts present
|
||||
- [ ] All signatures collected
|
||||
- [ ] Video recording complete
|
||||
- [ ] Backups verified
|
||||
- [ ] Certificates published
|
||||
- [ ] DID documents prepared
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Post-Ceremony Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate (Day Of)
|
||||
- [ ] Secure all artifacts
|
||||
- [ ] Verify backup storage
|
||||
- [ ] Publish fingerprints
|
||||
- [ ] Notarize minutes
|
||||
- [ ] Archive video recording
|
||||
|
||||
### Week After
|
||||
- [ ] Publish DID documents online
|
||||
- [ ] Update certificate registry
|
||||
- [ ] Distribute artifacts to custodians
|
||||
- [ ] Create ceremony report
|
||||
- [ ] Schedule audit review
|
||||
|
||||
### Month After
|
||||
- [ ] External audit review
|
||||
- [ ] Update CP/CPS if needed
|
||||
- [ ] Publish ceremony report
|
||||
- [ ] Schedule next ceremony review
|
||||
- [ ] Update procedures based on lessons learned
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Measures
|
||||
|
||||
### Physical Security
|
||||
* Air-gapped room
|
||||
* Dual-control entry
|
||||
* No unauthorized devices
|
||||
* Continuous video recording
|
||||
* Witnessed procedures
|
||||
|
||||
### Cryptographic Security
|
||||
* HSM-protected keys
|
||||
* Multi-party control
|
||||
* Encrypted backups
|
||||
* Tamper-evident seals
|
||||
* Hash verification
|
||||
|
||||
### Procedural Security
|
||||
* Scripted procedures
|
||||
* Independent verification
|
||||
* Witnessed actions
|
||||
* Documented steps
|
||||
* Notarized records
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Incident Response
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Compromise
|
||||
1. Immediately halt ceremony
|
||||
2. Document incident
|
||||
3. Notify all participants
|
||||
4. Secure all artifacts
|
||||
5. Begin investigation
|
||||
6. Reschedule ceremony
|
||||
|
||||
### Equipment Failure
|
||||
1. Document failure
|
||||
2. Verify no key exposure
|
||||
3. Replace equipment
|
||||
4. Resume from last verified step
|
||||
5. Update procedures
|
||||
|
||||
### Procedural Error
|
||||
1. Document error
|
||||
2. Assess impact
|
||||
3. Correct if possible
|
||||
4. Restart affected step
|
||||
5. Update procedures
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Contacts
|
||||
|
||||
### Ceremony Officer
|
||||
* Name: [TBD]
|
||||
* Email: [TBD]
|
||||
* Phone: [TBD]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Custodians
|
||||
* Custodian 1: [TBD]
|
||||
* Custodian 2: [TBD]
|
||||
* Custodian 3: [TBD]
|
||||
|
||||
### Auditor
|
||||
* Name: [TBD]
|
||||
* Email: [TBD]
|
||||
* Phone: [TBD]
|
||||
|
||||
### Witnesses
|
||||
* Witness 1: [TBD]
|
||||
* Witness 2: [TBD]
|
||||
|
||||
### Video Scribe
|
||||
* Name: [TBD]
|
||||
* Email: [TBD]
|
||||
* Phone: [TBD]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|
||||
|---------|------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| 1.0 | 2025-11-10 | Ceremony Officer | Initial runbook |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Approval
|
||||
|
||||
**Ceremony Officer:** _________________ Date: _________
|
||||
|
||||
**CISO:** _________________ Date: _________
|
||||
|
||||
**Founding Council:** _________________ Date: _________
|
||||
|
||||
200
docs/governance/procedures/security-audit.md
Normal file
200
docs/governance/procedures/security-audit.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
|
||||
# Security Audit Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
This document provides a comprehensive security audit checklist for The Order monorepo.
|
||||
|
||||
## Authentication & Authorization
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All API endpoints require authentication
|
||||
- [ ] JWT tokens are properly validated and signed
|
||||
- [ ] DID signatures are cryptographically verified
|
||||
- [ ] eIDAS certificates are validated with proper chain of trust
|
||||
- [ ] Role-based access control (RBAC) is enforced
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is supported where required
|
||||
- [ ] Session management is secure (timeouts, invalidation)
|
||||
- [ ] Password policies are enforced (if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] API keys are stored securely and rotated regularly
|
||||
- [ ] OAuth2/OIDC flows are implemented correctly
|
||||
|
||||
## Secrets Management
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets in code
|
||||
- [ ] Secrets are stored in AWS Secrets Manager or Azure Key Vault
|
||||
- [ ] Secrets are rotated regularly
|
||||
- [ ] Secret access is logged and audited
|
||||
- [ ] Secrets are encrypted at rest and in transit
|
||||
- [ ] Environment variables are validated and sanitized
|
||||
- [ ] Secret caching has appropriate TTL
|
||||
- [ ] Secrets are never logged or exposed in error messages
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Protection
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Sensitive data is encrypted at rest
|
||||
- [ ] Data is encrypted in transit (TLS 1.2+)
|
||||
- [ ] PII is properly handled and protected
|
||||
- [ ] Data retention policies are enforced
|
||||
- [ ] Data deletion is secure and audited
|
||||
- [ ] Database connections use SSL/TLS
|
||||
- [ ] Database credentials are stored securely
|
||||
- [ ] Backup encryption is enabled
|
||||
- [ ] Data masking is used in non-production environments
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Validation & Sanitization
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All user inputs are validated
|
||||
- [ ] SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
|
||||
- [ ] NoSQL injection prevention
|
||||
- [ ] XSS prevention (output encoding)
|
||||
- [ ] CSRF protection is enabled
|
||||
- [ ] File upload validation (type, size, content)
|
||||
- [ ] Path traversal prevention
|
||||
- [ ] Command injection prevention
|
||||
- [ ] XML/XXE injection prevention
|
||||
- [ ] LDAP injection prevention
|
||||
|
||||
## API Security
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Rate limiting is implemented
|
||||
- [ ] API versioning is used
|
||||
- [ ] CORS is properly configured
|
||||
- [ ] API authentication is required
|
||||
- [ ] Request size limits are enforced
|
||||
- [ ] Response compression is secure
|
||||
- [ ] API keys are rotated regularly
|
||||
- [ ] API endpoints are documented
|
||||
- [ ] API errors don't leak sensitive information
|
||||
- [ ] Request/response logging doesn't expose secrets
|
||||
|
||||
## Cryptography
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Strong encryption algorithms are used (AES-256, RSA-2048+)
|
||||
- [ ] Cryptographic keys are managed securely (KMS/HSM)
|
||||
- [ ] Key rotation is implemented
|
||||
- [ ] Cryptographic randomness is secure
|
||||
- [ ] Hash functions are secure (SHA-256+)
|
||||
- [ ] Digital signatures are properly validated
|
||||
- [ ] Certificate validation is comprehensive
|
||||
- [ ] TLS configuration is secure (strong ciphers, protocols)
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure Security
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Container images are scanned for vulnerabilities
|
||||
- [ ] Container images are signed (Cosign)
|
||||
- [ ] SBOM is generated for all artifacts
|
||||
- [ ] Infrastructure as Code is reviewed
|
||||
- [ ] Network policies are enforced
|
||||
- [ ] Firewall rules are properly configured
|
||||
- [ ] Load balancers have DDoS protection
|
||||
- [ ] WAF rules are configured
|
||||
- [ ] Secrets are not exposed in infrastructure configs
|
||||
- [ ] Resource limits are enforced
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Management
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Dependencies are regularly updated
|
||||
- [ ] Vulnerable dependencies are identified and patched
|
||||
- [ ] Dependency scanning is automated (Grype, Trivy)
|
||||
- [ ] License compliance is checked
|
||||
- [ ] Unused dependencies are removed
|
||||
- [ ] Dependency pinning is used where appropriate
|
||||
- [ ] Supply chain security is monitored
|
||||
|
||||
## Logging & Monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Security events are logged
|
||||
- [ ] Logs are stored securely
|
||||
- [ ] Log retention policies are enforced
|
||||
- [ ] Sensitive data is not logged
|
||||
- [ ] Log access is restricted and audited
|
||||
- [ ] Security monitoring and alerting is configured
|
||||
- [ ] Incident response procedures are documented
|
||||
- [ ] Security metrics are tracked
|
||||
|
||||
## Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] GDPR compliance (if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] eIDAS compliance
|
||||
- [ ] ISO 27001 alignment (if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] SOC 2 compliance (if applicable)
|
||||
- [ ] Regulatory requirements are met
|
||||
- [ ] Privacy policies are up to date
|
||||
- [ ] Data processing agreements are in place
|
||||
- [ ] Compliance audits are conducted regularly
|
||||
|
||||
## Threat Modeling
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Threat model is documented
|
||||
- [ ] Attack surfaces are identified
|
||||
- [ ] Threat vectors are analyzed
|
||||
- [ ] Mitigation strategies are implemented
|
||||
- [ ] Threat model is reviewed regularly
|
||||
- [ ] New features are threat modeled
|
||||
- [ ] Third-party integrations are assessed
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Penetration testing is conducted regularly
|
||||
- [ ] Vulnerability scanning is automated
|
||||
- [ ] Security code review is performed
|
||||
- [ ] Fuzzing is used for critical components
|
||||
- [ ] Security regression tests are in place
|
||||
- [ ] Bug bounty program is considered
|
||||
- [ ] Security testing is part of CI/CD
|
||||
|
||||
## Incident Response
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Incident response plan is documented
|
||||
- [ ] Security contacts are identified
|
||||
- [ ] Incident response team is trained
|
||||
- [ ] Communication plan is in place
|
||||
- [ ] Forensics capabilities are available
|
||||
- [ ] Recovery procedures are documented
|
||||
- [ ] Post-incident review process exists
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Training
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Security training is provided to developers
|
||||
- [ ] Security awareness program exists
|
||||
- [ ] Secure coding guidelines are followed
|
||||
- [ ] Security best practices are documented
|
||||
- [ ] Security updates are communicated
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Schedule
|
||||
|
||||
- **Monthly**: Dependency updates, security patches
|
||||
- **Quarterly**: Security audit, threat model review
|
||||
- **Annually**: Penetration testing, compliance audit
|
||||
- **As needed**: Security incidents, new features, major changes
|
||||
|
||||
## Tools & Resources
|
||||
|
||||
### Automated Scanning
|
||||
- **Trivy**: Container and filesystem scanning
|
||||
- **Grype**: Dependency vulnerability scanning
|
||||
- **Syft**: SBOM generation
|
||||
- **ESLint Security Plugin**: Static code analysis
|
||||
- **SonarQube**: Code quality and security
|
||||
|
||||
### Manual Testing
|
||||
- **OWASP ZAP**: Web application security testing
|
||||
- **Burp Suite**: Web security testing
|
||||
- **Nmap**: Network scanning
|
||||
- **Metasploit**: Penetration testing
|
||||
|
||||
### Resources
|
||||
- [OWASP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/)
|
||||
- [OWASP API Security Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-api-security/)
|
||||
- [CWE Top 25](https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/)
|
||||
- [NIST Cybersecurity Framework](https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework)
|
||||
|
||||
## Sign-off
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Security audit completed
|
||||
- [ ] Findings documented
|
||||
- [ ] Remediation plan created
|
||||
- [ ] Timeline established
|
||||
- [ ] Stakeholders notified
|
||||
|
||||
**Audit Date**: _______________
|
||||
**Auditor**: _______________
|
||||
**Next Review Date**: _______________
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user