Files
smom-dbis-138/docs/operations/status-reports/OPTIMIZED_MAX_VALIDATORS.md
defiQUG 1fb7266469 Add Oracle Aggregator and CCIP Integration
- Introduced Aggregator.sol for Chainlink-compatible oracle functionality, including round-based updates and access control.
- Added OracleWithCCIP.sol to extend Aggregator with CCIP cross-chain messaging capabilities.
- Created .gitmodules to include OpenZeppelin contracts as a submodule.
- Developed a comprehensive deployment guide in NEXT_STEPS_COMPLETE_GUIDE.md for Phase 2 and smart contract deployment.
- Implemented Vite configuration for the orchestration portal, supporting both Vue and React frameworks.
- Added server-side logic for the Multi-Cloud Orchestration Portal, including API endpoints for environment management and monitoring.
- Created scripts for resource import and usage validation across non-US regions.
- Added tests for CCIP error handling and integration to ensure robust functionality.
- Included various new files and directories for the orchestration portal and deployment scripts.
2025-12-12 14:57:48 -08:00

4.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Optimized Deployment - Maximum Validators (48 Validators)

Strategy: Maximum Validators for Best Consensus Resilience

This configuration maximizes the number of validators to get the "biggest bang" from the 240 vCPU quota.

Configuration

Per-Region Resources (10 vCPUs)

  • System Nodes: 3 × Standard_D2s_v3 = 6 vCPUs
  • Validator Nodes: 2 × Standard_B2s = 4 vCPUs
  • Sentry Nodes: 0 (deploy as pods on system nodes - no quota needed)
  • Total: 10 vCPUs per region

Total Resources (24 Regions)

  • System Nodes: 72 (3 × 24 regions) = 144 vCPUs
  • Validator Nodes: 48 (2 × 24 regions) = 96 vCPUs
  • Sentry Nodes: 0 (deploy as pods - no quota)
  • Total: 120 nodes, 240 vCPUs

Benefits of 48 Validators

Consensus Resilience

  • Current (24 validators): 13 minimum for consensus, 11 can fail
  • Optimized (48 validators): 25 minimum for consensus, 23 can fail
  • Improvement: 2x fault tolerance!

Network Security

  • Geographic Distribution: 2 validators per region = better redundancy
  • Attack Resistance: Much harder to compromise 25+ validators
  • Decentralization: More validators = better network decentralization

Performance

  • Block Production: More validators = better block distribution
  • Network Resilience: Can lose entire regions and still maintain consensus
  • Fault Tolerance: Can handle 23 validator failures (vs 11 previously)

Sentry Strategy

Deploy Sentries as Pods

  • No Quota Needed: Sentries run on system nodes
  • Cost Effective: No additional VM costs
  • Flexible: Can scale sentries independently
  • Resource Sharing: System nodes have capacity for sentry pods

Sentry Pod Configuration

  • Deployment: Kubernetes pods on system nodes
  • Resources: 1-2 vCPUs, 2-4GB RAM per sentry
  • Count: 1-2 sentries per region (flexible)
  • Total: 24-48 sentry pods (no quota impact)

Cost Analysis

Per Region

  • System Nodes: 3 × Standard_D2s_v3 = ~$210/month
  • Validator Nodes: 2 × Standard_B2s = ~$30/month
  • Sentry Pods: $0 (runs on system nodes)
  • Total per Region: ~$240/month

Total (24 Regions)

  • System Nodes: 72 × Standard_D2s_v3 = ~$5,040/month
  • Validator Nodes: 48 × Standard_B2s = ~$720/month
  • Sentry Pods: $0
  • Total: ~$5,760/month

Comparison

Metric 24 Validators 48 Validators Improvement
Validators 24 48 2x
Fault Tolerance 11 failures 23 failures 2x
Consensus Minimum 13 25 Better security
Sentries 24 VMs 24-48 pods Cost savings
Total Cost ~$5,760/month ~$5,760/month Same cost

Network Architecture

Validators (48)

  • Role: Consensus and block production
  • Distribution: 2 per region
  • Peering: Via sentry pods (private)
  • Consensus: QBFT 2.0 (48 validators = 25 minimum for consensus)

Sentries (24-48 Pods)

  • Role: P2P relay and protection
  • Distribution: 1-2 pods per region
  • Deployment: Kubernetes pods on system nodes
  • Public Access: Yes (P2P port 30303)

System Nodes (72)

  • Role: Kubernetes system workloads + sentry pods
  • Distribution: 3 per region
  • Workloads: Monitoring, logging, ingress, sentries

Deployment Strategy

Phase 1: Foundation (Complete)

  • Cloud for Sovereignty foundation deployed

Phase 2: AKS Clusters

  • Deploy AKS clusters in 24 regions
  • 3 system nodes per cluster
  • Total: 72 system nodes

Phase 3: Validator Node Pools

  • Deploy validator node pools in 24 regions
  • 2 validators per region
  • Total: 48 validator nodes

Phase 4: Sentry Pods

  • Deploy sentry pods on system nodes
  • 1-2 sentries per region
  • Total: 24-48 sentry pods (no quota)

Phase 5: Besu Network

  • Deploy Besu validators on validator nodes
  • Deploy Besu sentries as pods
  • Configure peering between regions
  • Start consensus network

Recommendation

Use 48 Validators Configuration - This gives the "biggest bang" by:

  1. Doubling validator count (24 → 48)
  2. Doubling fault tolerance (11 → 23 failures)
  3. Better consensus security (25 minimum vs 13)
  4. Same cost (~$5,760/month)
  5. Sentries as pods (no quota, flexible scaling)