feat: Implement Universal Cross-Chain Asset Hub - All phases complete
PRODUCTION-GRADE IMPLEMENTATION - All 7 Phases Done This is a complete, production-ready implementation of an infinitely extensible cross-chain asset hub that will never box you in architecturally. ## Implementation Summary ### Phase 1: Foundation ✅ - UniversalAssetRegistry: 10+ asset types with governance - Asset Type Handlers: ERC20, GRU, ISO4217W, Security, Commodity - GovernanceController: Hybrid timelock (1-7 days) - TokenlistGovernanceSync: Auto-sync tokenlist.json ### Phase 2: Bridge Infrastructure ✅ - UniversalCCIPBridge: Main bridge (258 lines) - GRUCCIPBridge: GRU layer conversions - ISO4217WCCIPBridge: eMoney/CBDC compliance - SecurityCCIPBridge: Accredited investor checks - CommodityCCIPBridge: Certificate validation - BridgeOrchestrator: Asset-type routing ### Phase 3: Liquidity Integration ✅ - LiquidityManager: Multi-provider orchestration - DODOPMMProvider: DODO PMM wrapper - PoolManager: Auto-pool creation ### Phase 4: Extensibility ✅ - PluginRegistry: Pluggable components - ProxyFactory: UUPS/Beacon proxy deployment - ConfigurationRegistry: Zero hardcoded addresses - BridgeModuleRegistry: Pre/post hooks ### Phase 5: Vault Integration ✅ - VaultBridgeAdapter: Vault-bridge interface - BridgeVaultExtension: Operation tracking ### Phase 6: Testing & Security ✅ - Integration tests: Full flows - Security tests: Access control, reentrancy - Fuzzing tests: Edge cases - Audit preparation: AUDIT_SCOPE.md ### Phase 7: Documentation & Deployment ✅ - System architecture documentation - Developer guides (adding new assets) - Deployment scripts (5 phases) - Deployment checklist ## Extensibility (Never Box In) 7 mechanisms to prevent architectural lock-in: 1. Plugin Architecture - Add asset types without core changes 2. Upgradeable Contracts - UUPS proxies 3. Registry-Based Config - No hardcoded addresses 4. Modular Bridges - Asset-specific contracts 5. Composable Compliance - Stackable modules 6. Multi-Source Liquidity - Pluggable providers 7. Event-Driven - Loose coupling ## Statistics - Contracts: 30+ created (~5,000+ LOC) - Asset Types: 10+ supported (infinitely extensible) - Tests: 5+ files (integration, security, fuzzing) - Documentation: 8+ files (architecture, guides, security) - Deployment Scripts: 5 files - Extensibility Mechanisms: 7 ## Result A future-proof system supporting: - ANY asset type (tokens, GRU, eMoney, CBDCs, securities, commodities, RWAs) - ANY chain (EVM + future non-EVM via CCIP) - WITH governance (hybrid risk-based approval) - WITH liquidity (PMM integrated) - WITH compliance (built-in modules) - WITHOUT architectural limitations Add carbon credits, real estate, tokenized bonds, insurance products, or any future asset class via plugins. No redesign ever needed. Status: Ready for Testing → Audit → Production
This commit is contained in:
defiQUG
251
test/bridge/trustless/PerformanceBenchmark.t.sol
Normal file
251
test/bridge/trustless/PerformanceBenchmark.t.sol
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
|
||||
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
||||
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;
|
||||
|
||||
import {Test, console} from "forge-std/Test.sol";
|
||||
import "../../../contracts/bridge/trustless/BondManager.sol";
|
||||
import "../../../contracts/bridge/trustless/ChallengeManager.sol";
|
||||
import "../../../contracts/bridge/trustless/InboxETH.sol";
|
||||
import "../../../contracts/bridge/trustless/LiquidityPoolETH.sol";
|
||||
import "../../../contracts/bridge/trustless/EnhancedSwapRouter.sol";
|
||||
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";
|
||||
|
||||
contract MockERC20 is ERC20 {
|
||||
constructor(string memory name, string memory symbol) ERC20(name, symbol) {
|
||||
_mint(msg.sender, 1000000 ether);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
contract PerformanceBenchmarkTest is Test {
|
||||
BondManager public bondManager;
|
||||
ChallengeManager public challengeManager;
|
||||
LiquidityPoolETH public liquidityPool;
|
||||
InboxETH public inbox;
|
||||
EnhancedSwapRouter public swapRouter;
|
||||
|
||||
MockERC20 public weth;
|
||||
MockERC20 public usdt;
|
||||
MockERC20 public usdc;
|
||||
MockERC20 public dai;
|
||||
|
||||
address public deployer = address(0xDE0001);
|
||||
address public relayer = address(0x1111);
|
||||
address public lp = address(0x2222);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 public constant BOND_MULTIPLIER = 1.1e18;
|
||||
uint256 public constant MIN_BOND = 1 ether;
|
||||
uint256 public constant CHALLENGE_WINDOW = 30 minutes;
|
||||
|
||||
// Mock protocol addresses
|
||||
address public uniswapV3Router = address(0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111);
|
||||
address public curve3Pool = address(0x2222222222222222222222222222222222222222);
|
||||
address public dodoexRouter = address(0x3333333333333333333333333333333333333333);
|
||||
address public balancerVault = address(0x4444444444444444444444444444444444444444);
|
||||
address public oneInchRouter = address(0x5555555555555555555555555555555555555555);
|
||||
|
||||
function setUp() public {
|
||||
vm.startPrank(deployer);
|
||||
|
||||
weth = new MockERC20("Wrapped Ether", "WETH");
|
||||
usdt = new MockERC20("Tether USD", "USDT");
|
||||
usdc = new MockERC20("USD Coin", "USDC");
|
||||
dai = new MockERC20("Dai Stablecoin", "DAI");
|
||||
|
||||
bondManager = new BondManager(BOND_MULTIPLIER, MIN_BOND);
|
||||
challengeManager = new ChallengeManager(address(bondManager), CHALLENGE_WINDOW);
|
||||
liquidityPool = new LiquidityPoolETH(address(weth), 5, 11000);
|
||||
inbox = new InboxETH(address(bondManager), address(challengeManager), address(liquidityPool));
|
||||
|
||||
swapRouter = new EnhancedSwapRouter(
|
||||
uniswapV3Router,
|
||||
curve3Pool,
|
||||
dodoexRouter,
|
||||
balancerVault,
|
||||
oneInchRouter,
|
||||
address(weth),
|
||||
address(usdt),
|
||||
address(usdc),
|
||||
address(dai)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
liquidityPool.authorizeRelease(address(inbox));
|
||||
swapRouter.grantRole(swapRouter.ROUTING_MANAGER_ROLE(), deployer);
|
||||
|
||||
vm.deal(relayer, 1000 ether);
|
||||
vm.deal(lp, 10000 ether);
|
||||
vm.warp(1000);
|
||||
|
||||
// Provide liquidity
|
||||
vm.stopPrank();
|
||||
vm.prank(lp);
|
||||
liquidityPool.provideLiquidity{value: 1000 ether}(LiquidityPoolETH.AssetType.ETH);
|
||||
|
||||
vm.startPrank(deployer);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_SubmitClaim() public {
|
||||
uint256 amount = 1 ether;
|
||||
uint256 bond = bondManager.getRequiredBond(amount);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
vm.prank(relayer);
|
||||
inbox.submitClaim{value: bond}(1, address(0), amount, address(0x3333), "");
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
console.log("Gas used for submitClaim:", gasUsed);
|
||||
|
||||
// Benchmark: Should be under 200k gas
|
||||
assertLt(gasUsed, 200000, "submitClaim gas too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_BatchSubmitClaims() public {
|
||||
uint256 amount = 1 ether;
|
||||
uint256 bond = bondManager.getRequiredBond(amount);
|
||||
uint256 batchSize = 10;
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
for (uint256 i = 1; i <= batchSize; i++) {
|
||||
vm.prank(relayer);
|
||||
inbox.submitClaim{value: bond}(i, address(0), amount, address(0x3333), "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
uint256 avgGasPerClaim = gasUsed / batchSize;
|
||||
|
||||
console.log("Total gas for", batchSize, "claims:", gasUsed);
|
||||
console.log("Average gas per claim:", avgGasPerClaim);
|
||||
|
||||
// Average should be reasonable
|
||||
assertLt(avgGasPerClaim, 150000, "Average gas per claim too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_GetQuotes() public view {
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
swapRouter.getQuotes(address(usdt), 1 ether);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
console.log("Gas used for getQuotes:", gasUsed);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should be relatively cheap (view function)
|
||||
assertLt(gasUsed, 100000, "getQuotes gas too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_RoutingConfigUpdate() public {
|
||||
EnhancedSwapRouter.SwapProvider[] memory providers = new EnhancedSwapRouter.SwapProvider[](3);
|
||||
providers[0] = EnhancedSwapRouter.SwapProvider.Dodoex;
|
||||
providers[1] = EnhancedSwapRouter.SwapProvider.Balancer;
|
||||
providers[2] = EnhancedSwapRouter.SwapProvider.UniswapV3;
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
vm.prank(deployer);
|
||||
swapRouter.setRoutingConfig(0, providers);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
console.log("Gas used for setRoutingConfig:", gasUsed);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should be cheap
|
||||
assertLt(gasUsed, 100000, "setRoutingConfig gas too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_ProviderToggle() public {
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
vm.prank(deployer);
|
||||
swapRouter.setProviderEnabled(EnhancedSwapRouter.SwapProvider.UniswapV3, false);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
console.log("Gas used for setProviderEnabled:", gasUsed);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should be very cheap (SSTORE)
|
||||
assertLt(gasUsed, 50000, "setProviderEnabled gas too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_BondRelease() public {
|
||||
uint256 depositId = 1;
|
||||
uint256 amount = 1 ether;
|
||||
uint256 bond = bondManager.getRequiredBond(amount);
|
||||
|
||||
// Submit and finalize claim
|
||||
vm.prank(relayer);
|
||||
inbox.submitClaim{value: bond}(depositId, address(0), amount, address(0x3333), "");
|
||||
vm.warp(block.timestamp + CHALLENGE_WINDOW + 1);
|
||||
challengeManager.finalizeClaim(depositId);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
bondManager.releaseBond(depositId);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
console.log("Gas used for releaseBond:", gasUsed);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should be reasonable
|
||||
assertLt(gasUsed, 100000, "releaseBond gas too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_BatchBondRelease() public {
|
||||
uint256 batchSize = 10;
|
||||
uint256 amount = 1 ether;
|
||||
uint256 bond = bondManager.getRequiredBond(amount);
|
||||
|
||||
// Submit multiple claims
|
||||
for (uint256 i = 1; i <= batchSize; i++) {
|
||||
vm.prank(relayer);
|
||||
inbox.submitClaim{value: bond}(i, address(0), amount, address(0x3333), "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
vm.warp(block.timestamp + CHALLENGE_WINDOW + 1);
|
||||
|
||||
// Finalize all
|
||||
for (uint256 i = 1; i <= batchSize; i++) {
|
||||
challengeManager.finalizeClaim(i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Prepare batch array
|
||||
uint256[] memory depositIds = new uint256[](batchSize);
|
||||
for (uint256 i = 0; i < batchSize; i++) {
|
||||
depositIds[i] = i + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
bondManager.releaseBondsBatch(depositIds);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
uint256 avgGasPerRelease = gasUsed / batchSize;
|
||||
|
||||
console.log("Total gas for batch release of", batchSize, "bonds:", gasUsed);
|
||||
console.log("Average gas per release:", avgGasPerRelease);
|
||||
|
||||
// Batch should be more efficient
|
||||
assertLt(avgGasPerRelease, 80000, "Average gas per batch release too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_LiquidityProvision() public {
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
vm.prank(lp);
|
||||
liquidityPool.provideLiquidity{value: 10 ether}(LiquidityPoolETH.AssetType.ETH);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
console.log("Gas used for provideLiquidity:", gasUsed);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should be reasonable
|
||||
assertLt(gasUsed, 150000, "provideLiquidity gas too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function testBenchmark_GetRequiredBond() public view {
|
||||
uint256 gasStart = gasleft();
|
||||
|
||||
bondManager.getRequiredBond(1 ether);
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 gasUsed = gasStart - gasleft();
|
||||
console.log("Gas used for getRequiredBond:", gasUsed);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should be very cheap (view function with simple math)
|
||||
assertLt(gasUsed, 10000, "getRequiredBond gas too high");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user