4.5 KiB
Example Proposal: Minor Feature Addition
Note: This is an EXAMPLE proposal for reference. It demonstrates a proposal for a non-breaking feature addition that requires formal proposal due to cross-system impact.
Tier-1 Canonical System Change Proposal
Proposal ID: PROPOSAL-2025-0201-001 Date: 2025-02-01 Proposer: DBIS Development Team System Affected: DBIS Type: Functional
1. Executive Summary
This proposal adds a new API endpoint to DBIS for retrieving enhanced account information. While non-breaking, this change requires formal proposal due to potential cross-system integration by ICCC and SMOM/SMOA systems.
2. Rationale and Justification
Problem Statement
ICCC and SMOM/SMOA systems require enhanced account information that is currently not available through existing DBIS APIs. This limits cross-system integration capabilities.
Proposed Solution
Add new /api/v1/accounts/{id}/enhanced endpoint that returns extended account metadata including compliance status, risk tier, and jurisdictional information.
Alignment with Constitutional Principles
- Maintains DBIS responsibility for account information (Section II.A)
- Supports cross-system coordination (SMOM/SMOA responsibility, Section II.C)
- No impact on mutual recognition framework
- Preserves system boundaries
3. Impact Assessment
Affected Systems
- DBIS (implementation)
- ICCC (potential integration)
- SMOM/SMOA (potential integration)
- GRU
Scope of Change
- Repository:
dbis_core - Components: Account service, API gateway
- Interfaces: New REST API endpoint
- Documentation: API documentation, integration guides
Breaking Changes
- No breaking changes
- Breaking changes present
This is a non-breaking addition. Existing endpoints remain unchanged.
4. Recognition Requirements
- DBIS - Recognition status: Pending
- ICCC - Recognition status: Pending
- SMOM/SMOA - Recognition status: Pending
5. Implementation Plan
Phases
- Phase 1: API endpoint implementation (Week 1-2)
- Phase 2: Documentation and testing (Week 2-3)
- Phase 3: Deployment and integration support (Week 3-4)
Timeline
- Proposal Submission: 2025-02-01
- Review Period: 2025-02-01 to 2025-02-15
- Recognition Target: 2025-02-15
- Implementation Start: 2025-02-16
- Completion Target: 2025-03-15
Resources Required
- 1 backend developer (2 weeks)
- 1 API documentation writer (1 week)
- Testing resources (1 week)
6. Risk Assessment
Technical Risks
- Low Risk: Addition only, no modification to existing functionality
- Mitigation: Comprehensive testing, backward compatibility maintained
Governance Risks
- Low Risk: No impact on constitutional principles
- Mitigation: Maintains system boundaries, supports cross-system coordination
7. Testing and Validation
Testing Strategy
- Unit tests for new endpoint
- Integration tests with existing systems
- API documentation examples
Validation Criteria
- Endpoint returns expected data format
- No impact on existing endpoints
- Documentation complete
- Integration examples provided
Rollback Plan
- Simple endpoint removal if issues arise
- No impact on existing functionality
8. Documentation Updates
Required Documentation Changes
- API documentation: Add endpoint documentation
- Integration guide: Add integration examples
- CANONICAL_CONSTITUTION.md: No changes required
- NOTICE.md files: No changes required
9. Constitutional Compliance Checklist
- Does not unilaterally supersede another canonical system
- Maintains mutual recognition framework
- Preserves continuity principles
- Respects Tier-1 system boundaries
- Aligns with Section IV governance principles
- Documentation is inspection-safe
10. Approval and Recognition Log
| System | Status | Recognized By | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBIS | Pending | - | - | - |
| ICCC | Pending | - | - | - |
| SMOM/SMOA | Pending | - | - | - |
Final Status: Under Review Constitutional Amendment Required: No Version Increment: N/A
11. Additional Notes
This is a straightforward addition that enhances cross-system integration capabilities without impacting existing functionality or constitutional principles.
Example Only - This is a reference example, not an actual proposal.