Apply Composer changes: comprehensive API updates, migrations, middleware, and infrastructure improvements
- Add comprehensive database migrations (001-024) for schema evolution - Enhance API schema with expanded type definitions and resolvers - Add new middleware: audit logging, rate limiting, MFA enforcement, security, tenant auth - Implement new services: AI optimization, billing, blockchain, compliance, marketplace - Add adapter layer for cloud integrations (Cloudflare, Kubernetes, Proxmox, storage) - Update Crossplane provider with enhanced VM management capabilities - Add comprehensive test suite for API endpoints and services - Update frontend components with improved GraphQL subscriptions and real-time updates - Enhance security configurations and headers (CSP, CORS, etc.) - Update documentation and configuration files - Add new CI/CD workflows and validation scripts - Implement design system improvements and UI enhancements
This commit is contained in:
193
docs/fairness-audit/OUTPUT_WEIGHTS.md
Normal file
193
docs/fairness-audit/OUTPUT_WEIGHTS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
|
||||
# Output Weight Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Each output type in the fairness audit orchestration has a **weight** that represents the relative effort required to generate it. These weights are used to calculate the total output load (O) in the orchestration formula.
|
||||
|
||||
## Weight Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
Weights are determined by:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Processing Complexity**: How much computation is required?
|
||||
2. **Data Volume**: How much data needs to be processed/generated?
|
||||
3. **Format Complexity**: How complex is the output format?
|
||||
4. **Dependencies**: Does it depend on other outputs?
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Types and Weights
|
||||
|
||||
### Lightweight Outputs (0.5 - 1.5 units)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Metrics Export (1.0 units)
|
||||
- **Type**: `metrics-export`
|
||||
- **Weight**: 1.0
|
||||
- **Description**: Statistical parity difference, true positive rate, false positive rate metrics
|
||||
- **Complexity**: Low - Simple calculations, small output
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: None
|
||||
- **Format**: JSON/CSV
|
||||
|
||||
#### Alert Configuration (0.8 units)
|
||||
- **Type**: `alerts-config`
|
||||
- **Weight**: 0.8
|
||||
- **Description**: Automated alert rules for ongoing monitoring
|
||||
- **Complexity**: Low - Rule generation, small output
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: Metrics export
|
||||
- **Format**: YAML/JSON
|
||||
|
||||
#### Detailed Report JSON (1.2 units)
|
||||
- **Type**: `detailed-report-json`
|
||||
- **Weight**: 1.2
|
||||
- **Description**: Machine-readable detailed fairness analysis
|
||||
- **Complexity**: Medium - Structured data, moderate size
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: All metrics
|
||||
- **Format**: JSON
|
||||
|
||||
### Medium Outputs (1.5 - 2.0 units)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Flagged Cases CSV (1.5 units)
|
||||
- **Type**: `flagged-cases-csv`
|
||||
- **Weight**: 1.5
|
||||
- **Description**: Export of cases flagged for potential bias issues
|
||||
- **Complexity**: Medium - Data filtering, CSV generation
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: Fairness evaluation
|
||||
- **Format**: CSV
|
||||
|
||||
#### Executive Summary Slides (2.0 units)
|
||||
- **Type**: `exec-summary-slides`
|
||||
- **Weight**: 2.0
|
||||
- **Description**: Executive presentation slides with key findings
|
||||
- **Complexity**: Medium-High - Data aggregation, slide generation
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: All metrics, summary analysis
|
||||
- **Format**: PowerPoint/PDF
|
||||
|
||||
#### Dashboard Export (1.8 units)
|
||||
- **Type**: `dashboard-export`
|
||||
- **Weight**: 1.8
|
||||
- **Description**: Interactive dashboard with fairness metrics
|
||||
- **Complexity**: Medium - Dashboard generation, visualization
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: All metrics
|
||||
- **Format**: HTML/Interactive
|
||||
|
||||
### Heavy Outputs (2.0 - 3.0 units)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Fairness Audit PDF (2.5 units)
|
||||
- **Type**: `fairness-audit-pdf`
|
||||
- **Weight**: 2.5
|
||||
- **Description**: Comprehensive fairness audit report in PDF format
|
||||
- **Complexity**: High - Full report generation, PDF formatting
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: All analyses, metrics, findings
|
||||
- **Format**: PDF
|
||||
|
||||
#### Compliance Report (2.2 units)
|
||||
- **Type**: `compliance-report`
|
||||
- **Weight**: 2.2
|
||||
- **Description**: Regulatory compliance documentation
|
||||
- **Complexity**: High - Regulatory formatting, documentation
|
||||
- **Dependencies**: All analyses, audit trail
|
||||
- **Format**: PDF/DOCX
|
||||
|
||||
## Weight Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
### Why These Weights?
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Metrics Export (1.0)**: Baseline weight
|
||||
- Simple calculations
|
||||
- Small output size
|
||||
- Fast generation
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Alert Configuration (0.8)**: Lighter than baseline
|
||||
- Minimal processing
|
||||
- Small output
|
||||
- Can reuse metrics
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Flagged Cases CSV (1.5)**: 50% more than baseline
|
||||
- Requires filtering logic
|
||||
- Moderate data volume
|
||||
- CSV generation overhead
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Detailed Report JSON (1.2)**: Slightly above baseline
|
||||
- Structured data compilation
|
||||
- Moderate complexity
|
||||
- JSON serialization
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Executive Summary Slides (2.0)**: 2× baseline
|
||||
- Data aggregation required
|
||||
- Slide generation complexity
|
||||
- Visual formatting
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Dashboard Export (1.8)**: Between medium and heavy
|
||||
- Dashboard framework overhead
|
||||
- Visualization generation
|
||||
- Interactive components
|
||||
|
||||
7. **Fairness Audit PDF (2.5)**: 2.5× baseline
|
||||
- Comprehensive report
|
||||
- PDF formatting complexity
|
||||
- Large output size
|
||||
|
||||
8. **Compliance Report (2.2)**: Slightly less than PDF
|
||||
- Regulatory formatting
|
||||
- Documentation requirements
|
||||
- Structured output
|
||||
|
||||
## Weight Adjustment Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
### When to Increase Weight
|
||||
|
||||
- Output requires significant computation
|
||||
- Large data volumes
|
||||
- Complex formatting requirements
|
||||
- Multiple dependencies
|
||||
- Real-time processing needed
|
||||
|
||||
### When to Decrease Weight
|
||||
|
||||
- Simple calculations
|
||||
- Small output size
|
||||
- Reusable components
|
||||
- Cached results available
|
||||
- Parallel processing possible
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 1: Minimal Outputs
|
||||
- Metrics Export (1.0)
|
||||
- Alert Configuration (0.8)
|
||||
- **Total**: 1.8 units
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 2: Standard Audit
|
||||
- Fairness Audit PDF (2.5)
|
||||
- Metrics Export (1.0)
|
||||
- Flagged Cases CSV (1.5)
|
||||
- **Total**: 5.0 units
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 3: Comprehensive Audit
|
||||
- All 8 outputs
|
||||
- **Total**: 13.0 units
|
||||
|
||||
## Weight Validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Target Check
|
||||
|
||||
For input load I:
|
||||
- **Target Output**: O ≈ 1.2 × I
|
||||
- **Warning Threshold**: O > 1.5 × (1.2 × I)
|
||||
- **Example**: If I = 100, target O = 120, warn if O > 180
|
||||
|
||||
### Total Load Check
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expected**: Total ≈ 3.2 × I
|
||||
- **Warning**: Total > 1.3 × (3.2 × I)
|
||||
- **Example**: If I = 100, expected total = 320, warn if total > 416
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Dynamic Weights**: Adjust based on actual performance
|
||||
2. **Context-Aware**: Weights vary by dataset size
|
||||
3. **Machine Learning**: Learn optimal weights from history
|
||||
4. **Parallel Processing**: Reduce effective weights for parallel outputs
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- [Orchestration Engine](./ORCHESTRATION_ENGINE.md)
|
||||
- [Orchestration Design](./ORCHESTRATION_DESIGN.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user