Full optimization: 38 improvements across frontend, backend, infrastructure, and docs
Frontend (17 items): - Virtualized message list with batch loading - CSS split with skeleton, drawer, search filter, message action styles - Code splitting via React.lazy + Suspense for Admin/Ethics/Settings pages - Skeleton loading components (Skeleton, SkeletonCard, SkeletonGrid) - Debounced search/filter component (SearchFilter) - Error boundary with fallback UI - Keyboard shortcuts (Ctrl+K search, Ctrl+Enter send, Escape dismiss) - Page transition animations (fade-in) - PWA support (manifest.json + service worker) - WebSocket auto-reconnect with exponential backoff (10 retries) - Chat history persistence to localStorage (500 msg limit) - Message edit/delete on hover - Copy-to-clipboard on code blocks - Mobile drawer (bottom-sheet for consensus panel) - File upload support - User preferences sync to backend Testing (8 items): - Component tests: Toast, Markdown, ChatMessage, Avatar, ErrorBoundary, Skeleton - Hook tests: useChatHistory - E2E smoke tests (5 tests) - Accessibility audit utility Backend (12 items): - Vector memory with cosine similarity search - TTS/STT adapter factory wiring - Geometry kernel with orphan detection - Tenant registry with CRUD operations - Response cache with TTL - Connection pool (async) - Background task queue - Health check endpoints (/health, /ready) - Request tracing middleware (X-Request-ID) - API key rotation mechanism - Environment-based config (settings.py) - API route documentation improvements Infrastructure (4 items): - Grafana dashboard template - Database migration system - Storybook configuration Documentation (3 items): - ADR-001: Advisory Governance Model - ADR-002: Twelve-Head Architecture - ADR-003: Consequence Engine 552 Python tests + 45 frontend tests passing, 0 ruff errors. Co-Authored-By: Nakamoto, S <defi@defi-oracle.io>
This commit is contained in:
30
docs/adr/003-consequence-engine.md
Normal file
30
docs/adr/003-consequence-engine.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
# ADR-003: Consequence Engine for Ethical Learning
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
Accepted
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
Traditional AI ethics systems use static rules (constitutional AI, RLHF reward models). FusionAGI needed a system that could learn ethical behavior from experience — understanding that every choice carries consequences and that risk/reward assessment improves with data.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
Implemented a **ConsequenceEngine** that:
|
||||
1. Records every choice the system makes (action + alternatives considered)
|
||||
2. Estimates risk and reward before acting
|
||||
3. Records actual outcomes after execution
|
||||
4. Computes "surprise factor" (prediction error)
|
||||
5. Feeds into AdaptiveEthics for lesson generation
|
||||
6. Uses adaptive risk memory window that grows with experience
|
||||
|
||||
The weight system for ethical lessons is **unclamped** — extreme outcomes can push lesson weights below 0 (strong negative signal) or above 1.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
- The system develops genuine experiential ethics rather than rule-following
|
||||
- Early-stage behavior may be more exploratory (higher risk)
|
||||
- All consequence records are persisted via PersistentLearningStore
|
||||
- Cross-head learning via InsightBus amplifies ethical insights
|
||||
- The SelfModel's values evolve based on consequence feedback
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives Considered
|
||||
1. **RLHF-style reward model** — Rejected: requires human feedback loop, doesn't scale
|
||||
2. **Constitutional AI** — Rejected: static rules, doesn't learn
|
||||
3. **No ethics system** — Rejected: need accountability and learning signal
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user